Soft Landing September 24, 2008
Posted by naughtwirthreeding in Humor, Money & Investing, News & Events, Politics, The Economy.comments closed
It’s easy to say, “Let them all go BANKRUPT!” when it comes to this current financial crisis. But people who say that don’t understand the underlying principles behind what’s going on. The reason everyone is freaking out so badly over this is, if they go bankrupt, we (as in, you and me) go bankrupt. It’s as simple as that.
The banks, brokerages, and other institutions that are currently in trouble are in the business of playing with OPM — Other People’s Money. For you experienced investors, the retail part of their business is the stuff you are familiar with: stocks, bonds, mutual funds, etc. But for institutional and wholesale clients, the game is much, much different, and represents a much, MUCH bigger portion of the business these Wall Street firms deal with.
For those clients (and the BUH-illions of dollars they have in their accounts) the drill isn’t so much buy-this-sell-this, it’s give-us-your-money-to-invest-and-we’ll-take-good-care-of-you-no-really-we-will. Customers such as pension funds who hold assets that are so diversified it would be impossible to try to track them all down, rarely spend the time or energy to do so. They put faith in the big name on the front of the building they are investing with, and enjoy the sweet double-digit returns that roll in every year. Barely a thought is given to where those dollars are invested.
This gives the financial institutions free reign as to where to put a given client’s money, and subsequently a lot more zeroes on the fee they get to scrape off the top. The bigger the returns, the bigger the fee they are going to bring in. So it is in their best interest to look for the grand slam home run, regardless of the risk involved. All the customer needs to know is, their money is invested with (*insert big-time Wall Street investment firm here). Our name is our guarantee.
Well, as it turns out, not so much.
Do the brokerages have their own money invested in these mortgage-backed securities? Enough to rack up tens of billions of dollars in losses over the last 18 months. But that’s nothing in comparison to how much OPM they have invested in these worthless notes. And that means, whatever losses are incurred as a result of these bonds going belly-up are actually incurred by the entity holding the security: the pension fund, the teacher’s union, the institution that *thought* the money was safe and sound. They’re the ones who are going to be left holding the bag.
What does that mean? That means the pension fund or 401K you thought you had, you don’t have anymore — or if you do, the value of your shares just took a nose dive. That means the pool of funds your company uses for its medical self-insurance is now empty, or close to it. That means the cash the company you work for thought it had, it doesn’t have, meaning they have to liquidate assets or reduce staff in order to meet current obligations — leading to job losses, or the sale of physical plants, or both.
That is the end result of us simply letting these Wall Street fat cats bend over and squeal for a change. We end up squealing too.
But more than that, what is the long-term result? American business is resilient, and adapts quickly to environmental conditions. We can weather a storm, even a big one like this. We exploit opportunities when they appear. Companies who didn’t get bitten by the mortgage-backed securities bug will scoop up personnel and fixed assets at fire-sale prices and expand to meet pent-up demand where competitors have had to contract. Why can’t we just let them collapse and tough it out?
Because of the long-term effects on world capital markets. The U.S. dollar is the bell-weather currency against which most others are compared, and many others are directly pegged. A collapse of our capital markets without government intervention will cause two net effects. One, investors (mainly foreign governments) holding U.S. Treasury securities will dump them on the open market to try to recoup their investment before they lose their value. The more sellers on the market, the lower the price goes, and as such the comparative value of the dollar along with it.
And two, investors will be reluctant to invest in securities denoted in U.S. dollars for a long time, fearful that the currency will drop even further in value and eliminate any gains they might realize. Foreign investors expect the U.S. government to “protect” their investment with intervention such as this. Not doing so now will spook the market away from U.S. investments and into Euros, a currency that has enjoyed remarkable stability during a time when the American dollar has been plunging in value as a direct effect of Bush Administration policy aimed at boosting U.S. exports. That flight to Euro currency and investments may never reverse itself, and our position as the center of the world economy may be permanently lost.
That would have a devastating effect on energy prices, food prices, and durable goods prices to name a few, reduce our ability to manipulate inflation through Fed policy, and plunge the American economy into a recession the likes of which have not been seen since the 1930’s. The net effect could be unemployment affecting nearly one-half of American families to some degree. That means between you and me, one of us will lose our jobs.
It would do our hearts good to see the CEO of Merrill Lynch, for instance, with his Bentley in a government impound while he sells pencils on the corner of 5th and Broadway. And the government should take steps to see that the billionaires that got us into this mess help to pay the price for the recovery. But simply cutting these guys loose is, unfortunately, not in anybody’s best interest, least of all yours or mine.
It’s important that we have a soft landing for this crisis, or preferably a gust of wind to keep the ship aloft. A government bailout, though not ideal, is the best quick solution at our disposal. I am confident that the end result will set things on a course that will help to finally re-establish the confidence in the American financial sector that has been lacking for so long. When the dust settles we will have a new President. Hopefully that individual will possess the wisdom to implement regulation and independent oversight in a measure strong enough to prevent this type of thing from ever happening again.
* * * * *
This morning I saw the first of what will no doubt be many sleazy Republican congressman go on CNN with the following message: the crisis was caused by government regulation in the first place, government needs to get out of the way — eliminate all regulation on the capital and financial markets and let the situation resolve itself.
The parade of idiots has begun.
This guy was one of two things: either a dim-witted cookie-cutter conservative who believes whatever he’s told by his Republican party bosses because he’s too stupid to think for himself; or a Wall Street whore waist deep in financial sector political donations, with his head so far up some lobbyist’s ass that he can’t tell the difference between caviar and dog sh*t.
I have outlined this concept in a prior blog: trying to slam a deregulation bill through Congress while the country is begging for something (ANYTHING!) to be done, and done fast. It is impossible for me to stress to you how important it is that we resist these brainless twerps with ulterior motives. The very future of our nation and the stability of the world economy depends on us implementing real change that will not only correct the current situation, but also put enforceable constraints on a financial sector whose culture has bred a generation of salivating dogs just waiting for the next opportunity to tear at the flesh of any investor that walks too close to the cage.
Morons like this morning’s CNN guest, South Carolina Republican Senator Jim Demint, are the problem, and we need to make sure his voice is drowned out in what history will remember as the most crucial debate of the new millennium. We will get through this mess, we always do, but it will get resolved much faster if we ignore the free-market evangelicals (pronounced, “cheats and liars”) and let common sense dictate our course of action. That means reasonable, enforceable regulation with tangible punishment; that means independent oversight, free of influence from both the government and the private sector; and that means breaking the capital markets free of the paralysis they are currently in with an infusion of cash.
Not On My Watch September 21, 2008
Posted by naughtwirthreeding in Money & Investing, News & Events, Politics, The Economy.comments closed
The public is getting its first look at the bailout program that Secretary of the Treasury Paulson has coaxed out of Fed Chairman Bernanke and presented to the Bush Administration. It is essentially a redux of the solution utilized during the Savings & Loan Bailout of the 80’s & 90’s, where the government buys worthless assets at face value. In layman’s parlance, it is a “blank check” for $700 billion. And it’s exactly what the Bush Administration, and its Big Business cronies, want passed — quickly. We should not be so hasty.
The Bush Administration subscribes to the theory of what’s being called the “Shock Doctrine”. Essentially, exploit the adrenaline and reactionary tendencies of a crisis (such as 9/11 or hurricane Katrina) and shove through legislation that nobody in their right mind would ever allow under normal conditions.
During the days after 9/11 it was the suspension of most of our civil liberties, and a blank check to go fight any war the President wanted. Hurricane Katrina saw the complete annihilation of the public school system, replaced with a charter school scheme that served neither the students nor the community — but provided a nice fat government check for the companies running the schools.
Those and other atrocities breezed through Congress with barely a word in opposition. That’s what we’re facing now with this financial crisis, and that’s why we must push back. Hard. Fool me once, shame on you. We’ve done that. We’re being handed the “fool me twice” part with this bailout. Not on my watch, thank you very much.
Wall Street wants this pushed through now in the worst way. Why? Because they see the writing on the wall. The Democrats are going to win the White House, and they are going to be in firm control of the House and Senate. The party is over in the financial markets, and they want the last five months of the Bush Administration to be their last gasp of windfall profits and Atilla the Hun-style looting.
Pushing through a bailout plan that will set every failing financial institution back on solid ground will allow them to enter into deals they otherwise would never consider, deals that will guarantee them ludicrous profits if they succeed — and multi-billion dollar losses if they fail. Anybody who is anybody on Wall Street is checking to see that their golden parachute is packed properly, because after inauguration day they are jumping out of that plane, off to the Cayman Islands to enjoy the booty.
Not only can we not let them get away with it, we can’t let them leave the country with the hundreds of billions of dollars they have stolen from hard-working Americans like you and me. It has to start with putting stringent and legally enforceable conditions on this $700 billion bailout that is being proposed. Doing so will also ensure that we get these companies’ help in trying to unravel the mess that they have gotten us into.
What Secretary Paulson is proposing is this: the government buys the mortgage-backed securities at face value, and the company selling the security walks away with a check free and clear. No. Way. That is lunacy, and it sticks you and me, and our children, with the bill. These companies need to be held accountable, and the profits they earn once they become stable need to help to pay off the debt that the government is assuming on their behalf. So any company selling any worthless security under the bailout plan needs to be ready to open its books up to government inspection, and half of all quarterly profits realized should be applied towards re-paying the entire amount of the bailout they received. Every. Dime.
Additionally, each of these mortgage-backed securities is comprised of thousands of individual income streams. Some of them are worthless, but some of them are liquid and viable. What needs to happen is, the government needs to be able to de-couple the bad ones from the good ones, and sell the good ones back into the open market to help recuperate the money they paid for the security in the first place. That’s very possible, but it shouldn’t be the government’s job to do it. The previous owner should be taking responsibility for this task, but in return they should also be relieved of some of the amount of debt they owe to the government in accordance with the amount the government recovers from selling the assets back into the open market. And since these companies are repaying this bailout money with profits earned in the future, it is in their best interest to identify all of the viable income streams they can (subject to thorough due diligence on the part of forensic accountants and government auditors, of course) to reduce the amount they have to pay back.
If this goes well, the American taxpayer should not have to pay a single cent to finance the rescue of these Wall Street profiteers. If we take our time and do this right, we can still institute a fair and viable plan that will ensure stability of the American (and therefore the world) financial sector without burdening the country and its citizens with mountains of additional debt. I hope Congress has the wisdom to see what is being shoved down their throats, and the courage to take a deep breath and implement a plan that puts the American taxpayer first, and financial sector billionaires last.
Caveat Emptor September 17, 2008
Posted by naughtwirthreeding in Humor.comments closed
Well! Isn’t this fun. Three of the Big Five on Wall Street either bankrupt or bought out at fire sale prices; the two biggest mortgage guarantors bailed out by the feds; and the world’s biggest insurance carrier, a private company, taken over by the government as a condition of an $85 billion loan.
Something tells me that a few folks are going to be late with the yacht payment this month.
Why are we here? How did these Herculean financial entities wind up in this pickle? And more to the point, how can we stop the bleeding?
Mortgage-backed securities are how we got here. The reason Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, and AIG got suckered into this mess is that they were too greedy and too short-sighted to care what they were buying. And the way we can stop the bleeding is a three-pronged attack: oversight, regulation, and consumer protection. In short, government getting the reins back on the wild mustang that is the current financial sector of this economy.
Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz has a brilliant synopsis of the situation along with his recommendations for correcting the problem in an artricle appearing on CNN.com. His conclusions include the following:
“1. We need first to correct incentives for executives, reducing the scope for conflicts of interest and improving shareholder information about dilution in share value as a result of stock options.
“2. Secondly, we need to create a financial product safety commission, to make sure that products bought and sold by banks, pension funds, etc. are safe for “human consumption.” Consenting adults should be given great freedom to do whatever they want, but that does not mean they should gamble with other people’s money.
“3. We need to create a financial systems stability commission to take an overview of the entire financial system, recognizing the interrelations among the various parts, and to prevent the excessive systemic leveraging that we have just experienced.
“4. We need to impose other regulations to improve the safety and soundness of our financial system, such as “speed bumps” to limit borrowing. Historically, rapid expansion of lending has been responsible for a large fraction of crises and this crisis is no exception.
“5. We need better consumer protection laws, including laws that prevent predatory lending.”
I agree 110% with everything he says, and I feel the need to expand on a couple of items.
First, he talks about the creation of certain entities to facilitate the corrections that must take place in order to restore normalcy on Wall Street. I would offer the following suggestion: those entities must be free of any government or private sector influence. Funding must come from the government in the form of re-distributed taxes coming directly from financial institutions and private brokerages. Budgets must be unlimited and outside of governmental control. Employees of these entities must have no ties whatsoever to any financial institutions or government personnel/parties/agencies. They should not even be allowed to hold investments outside of U.S. Treasury bonds. Complete freedom of action on the part of these entities is the only way to ensure that reforms are going to work in the short and long term.
Second, and most importantly, it is critical that the public not fall for the B.S. non-answer answers from our political candidates. When the Republicans talk about “reforming” regulation, they really mean eliminating regulations. Every Republican president since Carter has whittled (and in some cases, hacked) away at the regulations that were keeping Wall Street from creating the type of crisis that we are now having to endure. Those regulations must be revisited, reviewed, updated, and re-instituted immediately. The “reform” that the Republicans want is to eliminate regulatory constraints, and they do so under the guise of unfettered capitalism being the solution for every problem. Well, in this case it was undisputably the *cause* of the problem, and you don’t put out a fire by continuing to light matches.
Additionally, historically speaking, the Democrats have done the opposite: they have used increasing regulation as a means to set themselves up as the arbiters of what is right and wrong in a given arena. Form this committee, have umpty-thousand hearings, introduce twenty pieces of legislation, and ultimately do nothing. In this instance, stagnation has the net effect of not regulating at all. Something needs to get done, and it needs to happen at the speed with which Wall Street itself makes things happen. Those guys are lightning fast, and as soon as they find a way to circumvent regulation, new regulation has to be put in place to stop the new work-around. They will do anything and everything they can to get around the law, and having somebody making sure they are playing by the rules is absolutely imperative. Their power must be absolute, their reach must be unlimited, and their actions unfettered by outside influence or political affiliation.
Whichever president we end up with, we will have a Congress controlled by Democrats — that much has been clear for months. Regulating and stabilizing Wall Street is more important than ending the war in Iraq, and I honestly can’t believe I’m saying that. But restoring faith in the financial sector is going to do more for this economy than stopping the $10 billion per day net outflows for this war in the long run. Foreign investment will begin to come back, strengthening the dollar and helping to balance our trade deficit.
But more importantly, it will restore the American public’s faith in our financial institutions and the products they sell. Caveat emptor is the buzzword of every seasoned investor: but the average guy putting $50 a month away for his kids’ college education doesn’t have the time to read the fine print of a 70-page prospectus. He shouldn’t have to, and we need to make it so that he doesn’t. Buying shares in a mutual fund or stock in a company should be as easy as buying a CD at the bank down the street. In order to actually get everyone involved in the investment process, we need to make it so that it is.










